Deramaxx vs Rimadyl – Which One Is Safer?

Deramaxx vs Rimadyl

When it comes to Deramaxx vs Rimadyl which of these drugs are considered safer by vets and pet owners both? The answer can vary depending on the specific situation and dog. Deramaxx for dogs is viewed by some vets as a safer option, because the enzyme blocked only affects pain and inflammation. Rimadyl blocks another enzyme in the body, the Cox 1 enzyme, which can contribute to inflammation but is also used in numerous other processes in the body of your pet. This means that comparing Deramaxx vs Rimadyl should include this factor in the comparison. Neither drug is classified as a steroid but both can work very well at managing pain and inflammation for your dog.

Most of the Deramaxx side effects are the same as those for Rimadyl. Possible bleeding and ulceration of the gastrointestinal system of your dog is a risk with either medication, and both can cause nausea, vomiting, and an allergic reaction. When evaluating Deramaxx vs Rimadyl you will find that both drugs can affect and impair the function of your pet’s liver and kidneys, and have caused death in some cases because of this. As one of the top Rimadyl alternatives Deramaxx has many of the same risks, and is classified as the same type of drug which is an NSAID.

The effective Deramaxx dosage is smaller than the effective dose of Rimidyl, and this is another reason why many vets prefer Deramaxx. Both drugs can be safe when used exactly as directed, and when all of the precautions and warnings are followed. The Deramaxx vs Rimadyl decision is one that your vet will make, and both of these drugs have many benefits but also carry risks. Rimadyl for dogs, and the other NSAIDS on the market, all have some common risks and should never be combined with over the counter medications without asking your vet first.